“There is a process…We are not saying whether it
will be done or not,” additional solicitor
general N Venkataraman told the court, arguing
that GST Council meetings must be held
physically and cannot be convened through video
conferencing.
The court’s intervention followed a public
interest litigation filed by advocate Kapil
Madan, who argued that taxing purifiers at 18
per cent by treating them as “luxury” items
undermined public health.
Political pressure has also mounted. In
November, former Delhi chief minister Arvind
Kejriwal urged the Centre to abolish GST on both
air and water purifiers. Industry and trade
bodies have also made representations to the
government, calling for the rate to be cut to 5
per cent.
Reinforcing these demands, the Parliamentary
Standing Committee on Science & Technology,
Environment, Forests and Climate Change
recommended in its December report that GST on
air and water purifiers and their consumable
parts should be slashed or abolished. The
committee said citizens should not be penalised
for trying to secure clean air and safe drinking
water.
Abhishek A Rastogi, founder of Rastogi Chambers,
said cutting GST to 5 per cent would be a
practical and policy-aligned step. “With
tightening judicial scrutiny on pollution
control and the growing recognition of clean air
and water as essential public health
necessities, these products can no longer be
treated as luxury goods,” he said. “A lower GST
rate would democratise access to essential
purification technologies and align indirect tax
policy with sustainability and health-equity
goals.”
Rastogi also noted that manufacturers face the
risk of accumulating excess input tax credit due
to higher GST rates on components and raw
materials, strengthening the case for
rationalising the rate structure.
Source:: Business Standard,
dated 29/12/2025.